Both StaticURLParser and DirectoryApp use FileApp for actual file
serving. The difference between them is that the former is by Ian and
the latter was added by me.
DirectoryApp
* does not serve index.html files,
* doesn't send any debug info in 404 responses,
* isn't available via PasteDeploy
* caches fileapp instances (which in turn cache file contents if it's small)
* the implementation is also much shorter
I thought it was enough of a difference to add it there, to have a
smallish directory serving app next to fileapp.
It's also in pasteob.fileapp now:
http://code.google.com/p/pasteob/source/browse/trunk/pasteob/fileapp.py
On 2009-06-12, Mike Orr <sluggoster@???> wrote:
>
> Which is best for serving static files or directories from a Pylons controller,
> StaticURLParser or FileApp/DirectoryApp? They seem to do the same thing.
>
> --
> Mike Orr <sluggoster@???>
>
> >
>
--
Best Regards,
Sergey Schetinin
http://s3bk.com/ -- S3 Backup
http://word-to-html.com/ -- Word to HTML Converter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Paste Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to paste-users@???
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to paste-users+unsubscribe@???
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
